(June 25, 2016 at 11:06 pm)paulpablo Wrote:(June 25, 2016 at 11:00 pm)Heatheness Wrote: When I see the FFrF make a challenge to our US government being used to advertise religion, atheist yell "preferential treatment" "breach of the separation of church and state" and when the religious state, "pick your battles, it's just a little sign, just a little break of the constitution, just a little statue, a nativity" everyone gets their hackles up. It just one small slight, it's not important, there are other things more important in this world.
Yes, there are but many little things make bigger issues and also set a precedence for future behaviors. We have seen this in history and now in many ways. Is it wrong to say recognize this one slight and make it right? Is it not beneficial to change the small wrongs before they add up to be big ones? Does equality really happen if we ignore all the small ways in which we are not equal?
It seems to me if you say it doesn't matter then it won't matter to you if it's corrected either.
There's two ways it could be corrected.
1) Either allow pictures of topless women of all ages to be posted anywhere in the forum potentially allowing people to break actual laws beyond forum rules and potentially allowing what would be classed as child pornography onto the forums.
2) Ban all pictures of any breasts. Practically speaking there would be no point to this whatsoever.
The rule of no nudity already exists. That is not in dispute. The rule does not discriminate.
BUT has it, is it and will it be upheld equally by the mods, is the question to be answered.
