(October 23, 2016 at 6:37 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: I think it's time OP got on with it. Let's suppose there is objective truth. Where does that leave us?
You'd probably see where is was going with this if you read everything. But 20+ pages fair enough. Pretty much i'd follow with asking how you can justify the use of objectivity. But from a naturalist world view would always end up being circular reasoning, requiring a trancendant cause.