And, for the record, eternalists aren't referring to any "Sicily". What they are referring to is an "Atlantis" that has been shown to have been above the water the whole time, while we were previously misled into believing it should be underwater. In other words, the underwater Atlantis does not exist, but Atlantis does. This is a better analogy to use for this whole "Sicily vs. Atlantis" thing.
Also, another thing:
If omnipotence is part of the definition of the classical theist God, then "God is omnipotent" is tautologically true. But it doesn't mean that God is real. This shows that a tautologically true statement may contain unsound or even logically incoherent concepts. So it doesn't mean we should use such statements as a basis for the position we take. Because, otherwise, using your overall argument, you should consider yourself a theist.
Also, another thing:
If omnipotence is part of the definition of the classical theist God, then "God is omnipotent" is tautologically true. But it doesn't mean that God is real. This shows that a tautologically true statement may contain unsound or even logically incoherent concepts. So it doesn't mean we should use such statements as a basis for the position we take. Because, otherwise, using your overall argument, you should consider yourself a theist.
