Quote:Take your claim "Witness testimony is demonstrably unreliable as a form of evidence". That is simply not true. We rely on it to some degree millions of times a minute all over the world: In court cases of all types (criminal, civil, family), the running of governments of all levels, the running of corporations, the reporting of news, writing of articles/books, etc.
Bullshit. We know who the witnesses are. Attorneys have the opportunity to cross examine them. They can question them about competing evidence that may have already been introduced OR they can trap them by introducing additional evidence later which discredits their testimony.
What YOU and your ilk are saying is that anonymous/forged/pseudoepigraphical works which have been repeatedly edited over the course of centuries MUST be accepted at face value with no further examination.
Fuck you. Fuck your god. Fuck your holy horseshit.
