RE: Israeli forces kill medic, wound 100 protesters in Gaza unrest, Palestinian ministry
June 13, 2018 at 7:31 pm
(June 13, 2018 at 6:50 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: That isn't any kind of evidence that Israel is, "the tip of the spear now for any American plan to harvest the Middle East off its resources." If you think it is, then you're a loony as I implied in my prior post.
How do you read the "installing of a Jewish state right in the middle of states dominated by Islam"?
If the west wanted an entry point into the Islamic backyard, all it has to do is "enter through Israel".
The evidence for the early British support for Israel:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_De...sh_support
Quote:Early British political support for an increased Jewish presence in the region of Palestine was based upon geopolitical calculations.[1][i] This support began in the early 1840s[3] and was led by Lord Palmerston, following the occupation of Syria and Palestine by separatist Ottoman governor Muhammad Ali of Egypt.[4][5]
Quote:French influence had grown in Palestine and the wider Middle East as protector of the Catholic communities began to grow, just as Russian influence had grown as protector of the Eastern Orthodox in the same regions. This left Britain without a sphere of influence,[4] and thus a need to find or create their own regional "protégés".[6]
Maybe you just don't want to see it?
Britain "engineered this conflict". Do you want to convince me to believe the word of British politicians?
What I quoted above, is "the tip of the spear" sentence, in other words.
Do you prefer "The regional sphere of influence"?
