RE: If theists understood "evidence"
October 8, 2018 at 2:20 pm
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2018 at 2:22 pm by RoadRunner79.)
(October 8, 2018 at 2:17 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote:(October 8, 2018 at 2:12 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Reasonable criticism and critique. Sure! I think that Christianity has certainly been and should be investigated. However; double standards and hyper-skepticism no.
Also, I wouldn't recommend your approach described either.
Diddums. You’re not in a position, either here or real life, to dictate to people how you think your beliefs should be viewed and criticised, or indeed carve out what you think is ‘reasonable’. Not unless you want to live a society entirely comprised of you. If that’s floats your boat, then feel free to set sail.
Also, hyper skepticism.
I think that I'm in an excellent position to decide what I think is reasonable. As to what atheists find reasonable, I find it incredibly inconsistent. Which is how I judge it by. Call me crazy, but I look at how people reason in other situations, and think that the same logic should follow, unless you can justify why not.
Also wouldn't the same apply to you?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther