RE: How can you prove that the gospel of Mark is not the "word of god"?
October 15, 2018 at 1:17 pm
(August 27, 2016 at 8:43 am)Lincoln05 Wrote: So this has been bothering me for a while. I am 100% sure that Matthew, Luke and John's gospels were not "divinely inspired" and they are not the "word of god" because of some of the errors I found in them. However, I can't find any errors in Mark's gospel. No historical errors, no theological errors, nothing. In addition to that, I don't see how it contradicts the old testament in any way.
How can you prove that Mark's gospel is not the word of god? Is there anything in this gospel that scholars don't agree with? Is there anything in the gospel that proves that this book was not divinely inspired?
The troll smell is strong on this one.
There is no such thing as a magic baby with super powers and human beings don't survive the death story like the Jesus mythology would imply.
None of the writers of the NT wrote them during the alleged time the bible claims the magic man existed. But it wouldn't matter to me if they did. The God of the bible is as real as Allah and Vishnu and Apollo.
FYI the Jews stole the Yahweh character from the prior polytheistic Canaanites in which Yahweh was a lesser deity as part of the divine family under the head God "El".