RE: The code that is DNA
December 9, 2019 at 3:14 pm
(This post was last modified: December 9, 2019 at 3:16 pm by Simon Moon.)
(December 8, 2019 at 7:33 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: Polymath,
In regard to your lightening strike analogy, it’s true we don’t really know where it’s going to strike , the laws of physics/nature are governing and it’s random.
The ordering of nucleotides however, must be governed phenomena because it becomes instructions that get decoded. The order represents something more than just the material it’s made from, this is profound.
however a lightning strike does not represent
anything but itself , doesn’t get decoded into a specific function nor gets error corrected.
I take it John 6IX has realized there is something unnatural at play.
I want to make an overall point here, not in response to a specific post, but it seems a bit strange that you are on an atheist forum, presenting us with your hypothesis concerning DNA. After all, most people here are not biologists, although many of us do tend to be abit more knowledgeable on the subject than many people.
You know who you have to present your hypothesis to, right? PhD biologists. After all, they are the ones that have spent most of their adult lives in school studying the subject, working in the associated fields of science, and, not only have vastly more knowledge than you do, but have more knowledge than you can actually imagine they have.
And they don't seem to agree with you. Not only that, but about 72% of biologists are nonbelievers. And most of the biologists that do believe, tend to be deists or pantheists, not Christians, Muslims, Hindus, etc.
So, please, publish and present your paper to biologists and change the minds of the most educated. Imagine how famous and worldview altering.
Or, at least post your hypothesis on one of the many, many biology forums available. Then you can post links here to the forums where you convinced biologists.
Oh wait, I forgot about the 'great science conspiracy' where 'proofs of god' are rejected without consideration.
![Dodgy Dodgy](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.