I mean if you want to persist in your error, be my guest.
From the first century, many Christians were already accepting Jesus as divine. It's absurd to think otherwise, given the documents that point otherwise.
Hell, according to Bart Ehrman, even before Mark was written, Christians already believed that Jesus was exalted to godhood upon resurrection. Then that evolved over the decades to become Jesus was exalted from the very beginning.
I'm sorry for being pushy and given the impression that I think you're lying, but it's always frustrating having discussions with you when there are disagreements. FWIW, I don't think you're lying. I do think you're being stubborn (is that a form of dishonesty? maybe) and that you don't like it when I persist in pointing out you're patently wrong.
From the first century, many Christians were already accepting Jesus as divine. It's absurd to think otherwise, given the documents that point otherwise.
Hell, according to Bart Ehrman, even before Mark was written, Christians already believed that Jesus was exalted to godhood upon resurrection. Then that evolved over the decades to become Jesus was exalted from the very beginning.
I'm sorry for being pushy and given the impression that I think you're lying, but it's always frustrating having discussions with you when there are disagreements. FWIW, I don't think you're lying. I do think you're being stubborn (is that a form of dishonesty? maybe) and that you don't like it when I persist in pointing out you're patently wrong.
