(June 26, 2021 at 7:52 am)Frank Apisa Wrote:(June 26, 2021 at 7:42 am)brewer Wrote: You came here under the guise of asking questions and then telling us that our responses were wrong. I consider that preaching or lecturing. You got hammered for that behavior which has nothing to do with fear. It has much to do with your close minded opinions regarding the responses that you asked for.Claim "fowl?" You did mean "foul"...right?
And then you claim fowl. Yea talent!
Anyway...the reason I came here was to ask a few questions.
I have disagreed with some of the comments. Are visitors here expected to accept everything fed to them without disagreement? Are people not allowed to question responses?
Do you know how to make any sense at all?
Yes foul, I have proof reading issues.
I make sense of it by looking at your approach, you used what most of us consider a less than acceptable one. Disagree and telling people they are wrong are two different animals.
Telling us/I that we/me had to accept the philosophical hypothetical 'a god could exist and you can't deny' (refine that all you want) as a valid position didn't set well from the very beginning. AFAIC arguing what if's is a waste of time, telling me that I have to accept them as valid, well, you've seen my response to that. .
If concrete evidence for a god can't be provided I'm not required to consider the hypothetical. God has been nothing but man's hypothetical concept from the beginning. Why should I consider yet another hypothetical version of it?
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
