(October 4, 2021 at 12:46 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(October 4, 2021 at 12:19 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Also, I don’t believe there’s any data on how long natural immunity lasts, or how effective it is compared to a vaccine. We actually have data on the effectiveness of the vaccine/s. Also, that Invermectin won a Nobel prize is completely irrelevant because it hasn’t been demonstrated to prevent or reduce the severity of COVID. You know what has? The goddamned vaccine. Please explain to me this line of reasoning:
“I’m not going to take the thing that has tons of data supporting its safety and efficacy behind it because I’m worried there isn’t enough data on its safety and efficacy, so instead I’m going to take these other things that have less data behind them, and/or data showing it’s not effective and potentially harmful.”
https://brisbanenationalreview.com/healt...weinstein/
Ivermectin is extremely safe, and even if it doesn't work, no harm done. It's certainly reasonable to say that Ivermectin is probably much safer than the vax. Personally, I took the vax, but still wanted to have Ivermectin on hand in case I contracted covid.
No harm done if it doesn't work and it may clear up those nasty worms and parasites. So win-win, right?
People are taking Ivermectin that is processed for use in large animals...not the people kind.
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius