(August 16, 2022 at 8:07 am)WinterHold Wrote:(August 16, 2022 at 7:07 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: 1. Thats’s NOT an ancient ‘copy’ of the Quran - it’s two leaves containing 63 verses. It’s an extremely important relic, but it’s not a ‘copy’.
2. Refuted, you’re just too pigheaded to understand.
Boru
1- If the two leaves are not sufficient for you, here's another ancient Quran dating to the late 9th to mid 10th-century:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Quran
Quote:The manuscript is thought to have contained 600 parchment folios made from sheepskin, which was commonly used because of the thinness of the finished product.
2-Not refuted.
1. The Sanas Cormaic dates from about the same period. This doesn’t make the miracles attributed to the author true.
2. Roundly, fully, and devastatingly refuted. Pigheaded, you are.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax