(September 1, 2009 at 3:40 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Suffice to say, there is no cherry picking going on at all, only 100% unprejudiced realism. Like I said, you naturally read it out of context - yeah of course there's a lot of nasty stuff in there, but the point is the opposite to what you summise.
What more can I say? Read it follishly and you can pick out many small examples out of context. In context, it is what I say. No contest.
And how the fuck do you decide on how to judge the big picture? How exactly do you have any real grasp whatsover on exactly how it should be read...how exactly do you have this 100% unprejudiced realism you claim to have?? That's fucking ridiculous. How would you 'get the message' when there are countless others that interpret it differently, and even when there are those that interpret it very like you do, no two people interpret things absolutely identically, so to claim 100% unpredjudiced realism is absolutely fucking ridiculous...
And by what logic then..do you somehow claim to interpret it better than others? The interpretation is subjective...so how do you genuinely explain all these horrible parts...???
You can choose (unfreely
) to see the whole thing in a 'good light' or to see it in a bad way or any other way...you can interpret it how you will...so what is it you can possibly know that others don't, that somehow means you have '100% unpredjudiced realism' on your side? What a fucking claim!Go on then..enlighten me! Lol.
EvF
