(September 3, 2009 at 8:22 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The premise for belief in God is that his existence is non evidential. Examining the evidence trail is completely irrelevant and off topic. You frame the question in your own understanding, whilst declaring your non understanding. This is completely illogical.
This is irrelevant to my question. My question is :Why do you believe, that believing in God without evidence is rational?
Quote:It is not something I don't understand, but an entity who's existence cannot be understood.
So how can you rationally justify believing in his existence, without evidence? Once again, this is my question. I repeat it because it's another time you've missed my point.
Quote:I don't have to explain how I can believe without evidence.Well all I'm asking is how you can rationally justify it without evidence. I want to understand why you believe without evidence. When evidence is the support.
Quote:It's a negative. I don't consider belief in God with evidence. It's nonsensical to my belief in God.
Irrelevant to my point once again, I know that you don't consider belief in God with evidence. I just wonder why you believe in him without evidence. I repeated myself again, because you missed my point again.
fr0d0 Wrote:Repetition[...], as I said, I am repeating my points because you are missing them. I only have one point and one interest here, and you just have to address it. Ok? And that is that: I wish to understand how you can rationally justify believing in God without evidence. Got that?
Quote:Do you see how much there you followed your own agenda and completely ignored my points?No I don't, because I only had one point and you didn't address it. I repeat it again and again because you miss it again and again. See above for my point, unless you want me to rpeat it once more!
Quote: If you continue this brainless quest I'll stop responding here. I want a discussion not mindless repetition. You're stone walling me.
You've continued with me again and again on the rest of the forum, and here it's actually on-topic, so I don't understand why you'd leave here if you've continued there.
As for the 'mindless repetition' point on your part, see above. You missed my point.
EvF