I am asking why you require there to be none in order to believe. I mean, why believe at all? Why believe without evidence? There's no evidence...but why believe without it?
You say rationally understanding it requires that there is no evidence. But I'm asking why you believe that. What makes you think it can be rationally understood at all? If it can't be understood with evidence, how can it be understood without it?
EvF
You say rationally understanding it requires that there is no evidence. But I'm asking why you believe that. What makes you think it can be rationally understood at all? If it can't be understood with evidence, how can it be understood without it?
EvF