(July 6, 2012 at 1:32 pm)ktulu Wrote: KCA is question begging "the cause", the conclusion is not sound. It's a bout as flawed an argument as they come.
How is it question-begging? It seems to be in a logically valid form:
1. For all x in X, P(x) --> Q(x).
2. P(y), where y is in X;
3. Therefore, Q(y).
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”