Why do you not believe in God?

[Taqiyya Mockingbird]

1. We have no more evidence for basic logic than for unicorns (any argument for logic would be circular)

That is untrue. Logic is a method, not a thing. We have plenty of evidence to suppot the efficacy of logic and reason and the consideration of evidence; there are tried and true. Unicorns and gods are not.

By rejecting logic and reason, you forfeit your right to (in your case PRETEND TO) use them in discussion with reasonable people, which means you really have nothing useful or interesting to say.

---

The second "if" was because I don't know for sure who goes to hell and a lot of theology has gone on after Pascal (17th century).

...and men are the arbiters of this?

---

I also want to make clear that it is possible to experience God personally, and so simply because you cannot verbalize the experience perfectly doesn't make it unreal or invalid. If discount the possibility of this apriori you are attacking a straw-man.

It doesn't matter how many times you assert this by fiat, it holds absolutely no weight because you refuse to define, describe, and substantiate it. It's bullshit.

---

Is your problem elementary logic?