RE: Does anyone have one reason that supports infallibilty?
July 20, 2012 at 6:55 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2012 at 6:56 pm by catfish.)
(July 20, 2012 at 6:49 pm)Nemo Wrote:(July 20, 2012 at 6:45 pm)Paul the Human Wrote: You've gotten your answer. The bibles have well documented inaccuracies. Fallible.
My answer as well. There are many books in the old and new testament that just arnt accurate...i know i keep going back to the book of Genesis but come on. To think the Earth was created by a higher being is just completely wrong. We know in detail how planets and stars are formed and what conditions are needed to support complex life such as ourselves.
Isnt that reason enough?
Not for me, the odds that we're hear typing in the forum are too astronomical.
I want to know what defines the Bible, the added stories? the historical accounts? the prophecies? I didn't witness all of the various books being assembled, I can't be sure what is supposed to be there and what isn't.
I'm positive of what's been changed in the Bible, but if someone changes something after the fact, who is to know the difference?
I don't consider the Bible to be an accurate translation...
In fact, I think the Bible predicts it's own corruption...
