(August 31, 2012 at 9:50 pm)Napoléon Wrote:(August 31, 2012 at 9:45 pm)Polaris Wrote: they are essentially no existent.
But, the problem I have is, essentially non existent, is not the same as non existent.
This is the thing. Regardless of what the existence is made up of, even if it is an incomprehensible void, it is still something. It still has a past, it potentially for all anyone knows still has a future.
So then the question I ask is more along the lines of: "What is the difference between that which is 'essentially non existent', and actual non existence?
I view it as an interpretation, an interpretation of observation. It still exists, but without form, its existence becomes meaningless.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.