(September 4, 2012 at 1:49 pm)Red Celt Wrote:(September 4, 2012 at 12:25 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: What's with the personal attacks?
Really? You read that, and your mind inserted the thought "personal attack"? Wow... just... wow...
You stated a falsehood (that nobody had objected to one of your posts) and I questioned the plane of thought that your mind-train operates on. Because it isn't Planet Earth.
(September 4, 2012 at 11:10 am)Rhythm Wrote: Can a robot design and build a robot better than itself..an emphatic "yes". There's nothing preventing it from doing so, even if it doesn't have any idea of what it's doing. All you need are a series of pass fail/loops and replication.
How did you get to that, following what I asked? And what would "pass/fail loops" be testing for? We didn't even establish what we meant by "better".
(September 4, 2012 at 11:10 am)Rhythm Wrote: How do you think we got here, lol?
Random mutations resulting in survivable/unsurvivable traits, non-randomly producing surviving traits. That's your answer for how a robot can produce a "better" robot? I said that we come back in a few generations... not a few million years.
Seeing as your objections aren't real- ie they dont operate on rational foundations, I couldn't take them seriously. Is that the basis of your cosmological delusions?
If you made any serious objections, I'd like to see them. I think you attempted a few, but none succeeded to my knowledge. If they did, please point them out. I'm dying to think of you as rational and not emotional. Your latest posts haven't been helping, with the "Wow just wow's" and other emoting.
I truly want to believe. Convince me.