No, he meant God communicating at all, with anybody. what we have here, in a form you can see, is exactly what VOID requested. ie: "God communicating with us".
The question of relevance to myself is again, way off topic. You stated:
So you are saying you want something irrefutable to prove God. This would then take away our choice to believe, and hence free will. So how do you reconcile that logically?
The question of relevance to myself is again, way off topic. You stated:
Retorth Wrote:why can't he conjure up something more profound or perhaps attempt to bring forth his message(s) in such a way people (particularly non-believers) can say "ok that definitely is from god, no doubt about it"?
So you are saying you want something irrefutable to prove God. This would then take away our choice to believe, and hence free will. So how do you reconcile that logically?
