(November 27, 2012 at 1:50 pm)Rhythm Wrote: That's true, and that's why the whole god bit is dismissed. Asking why god has stopped interacting with people is humoring those who don't feel obliged to offer any evidence that he ever did. It's simply granting someone that god "walked" with people at some time, spoke to them directly. All of this overt and obvious interaction actually occurred - granting all of it with absolutely nothing offered as evidence in the first place....and then asking why this all seems to have stopped.
He didn't ask why it "seems" to have stopped. He said that God has stopped.
Also, when you automatically dismiss any account of God appearing to people, don't be surprised when you suddenly find very little evidence that God appears to people.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”