(March 16, 2013 at 6:30 am)Esquilax Wrote:(March 13, 2013 at 10:38 pm)genkaus Wrote: I don't know how many more times I can say it - its a human fetus - not an individual human. It is genetically human, not anthropologically or socially human. Since rights are a social concept, they are not applicable to the fetus since it doesn't qualify as a human. If you're still too moronic to understand the logic, I don't know what else I could tell you.
Hey catfish? Here's genkaus literally admitting that a fetus is human- by some definitions- several pages back. Most of us have been. We just then add a bit of nuance, a term that appears to be completely lost on you at all times.
No, he asserted that it wasn't an individual human...
