Lol, you're right. But I won't threaten to leave the debate again. At this point, I don't even think this qualifies as one. At any rate...I'm gonna keep my posts shorter to avoid responding so much, and avoid reading long em responses. Lets try an exchange over one thought at a time. Fair enough?
Abiogenesis is quite an absurd thing to suggest, depending on what you think is being suggested by it. It is a Scientific theory that life began from lifeless matter. Evidence that such a thing could occur is available. This is not absurd and is quite fascinating. The absurd suggestion that is NOT a theory, is that complex life SPONTANIOUSLY came from lifeless matter. There is no evidence that such a thing is even plausible as it would take millions of years to develop from the basic constructs that have been duplicated into anything so complex as even an amoeba. Are you asserting that neither are theories and equally unfounded?
Abiogenesis is quite an absurd thing to suggest, depending on what you think is being suggested by it. It is a Scientific theory that life began from lifeless matter. Evidence that such a thing could occur is available. This is not absurd and is quite fascinating. The absurd suggestion that is NOT a theory, is that complex life SPONTANIOUSLY came from lifeless matter. There is no evidence that such a thing is even plausible as it would take millions of years to develop from the basic constructs that have been duplicated into anything so complex as even an amoeba. Are you asserting that neither are theories and equally unfounded?
