Conflicting statements in the bible

[Statler Waldorf]

Wow I mean wow, how wrong can one man be.

Try to postulate a purely non-Christian and naturalistic epistemology and we can certainly find out. :-P

In Waldork's case there is no knowledge or reasoning so a non-existent god could well be his model.

The rest of us are stuck with the real world, though. No room for fucking gods.

You have no clue what the real world is.

I cannot argue that your viewpoints apply only to your own view of reality, but that's such a lonely place to be.

Yup, lonely me and 2.3 billion other people on Earth, lol.

Having no criteria from which to to distinguish existance from non-existance, it doesn't sound like a reality at all! I'm not sure he knows how to recognize whether or not he's in a real place or one that doesn't exist, to him...one is not discernible from the other.

Without being able to explain how you can trust your senses, your memory, induction, your ability to reason, and the laws of deductive logic you have no criteria for reality; you’ve adopted a view of reality that is utterly indefensible. The funniest part is that you were so busy trying to defend your self-refuting and therefore false criteria for truth and reality that you never bothered to ask me if I had a criteria or not. The fact your criteria utterly fails does not prove that I do not have a logically coherent and cogent criteria; such arrogance amongst fools.