Quote:There is no evidence Jesus will return, and there is no evidence he was the Son of God. However, on that note, you cannot disprove these claims. In reality, all you can say is, "I don't believe it." And all I can say is, "I believe it happened." In the end, no one wins. Because neither party can display any proof.
Yes, I cannot disprove god, just as you cannot disprove santa claws. You can believe something that can very well be wrong. Evidence is greatly important. Without it, all we'd have is stories with nothing to support it.
Now, weather you see evidence as invalid or not, I need it. Without it, there can be no way for me to be convinced.
I will not turn away from science and into superstition all because someone mentioned it. I need evidence of god. if there is none then I will dismiss the claim as false.
Like when people kept telling me about ghosts and such. They always mentioned that, it was the ghosts that causes sounds in buildings, well, I looked into science and found other causes and so I dismissed the ghost claims.
Even though we cannot disprove just as you cannot prove, we can dismiss it.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
You claim, and so it's down to you to prove it. So....evidence please
![Big Grin Big Grin](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.