(July 27, 2013 at 2:45 am)Godschild Wrote: Yes I saw he corrected the name, he however did not correct the meaning he gave it, so why should I consider he corrected anything.
Because the name was the thing you were fucking taking issue with.
I honestly don't know what else he could have done, the name of the tree is literally the most self explanatory thing in the entire world.
"The tree of knowledge of good and evil? What the hell does that thing do? God's really creating these things with vague names, isn't he?"
What else did you want, a diagram? Should he have posted a youtube video puppet show explaining things? Jesus, GC, this is a forum, an exchange of ideas; if you think he's got it wrong, why don't you put your view of things out there so that people can decide for themselves? I mean, shit, that's the whole point of your big book of multiple choice fairytales to begin with!
I'd also like to note that, as I predicted, the idea of acknowledging any wrongdoing on his part, or amending his view on anything, was simply beyond GC here. Maybe I'm a prophet.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!