(August 10, 2013 at 10:32 am)Stimbo Wrote:(August 10, 2013 at 10:27 am)Theo Zacharias Wrote: I'm sorry, I won't response to any post unless the post is supported with argument/reason. I'm not interested in dogmatic position.
Yet you purport to believe in "God" despite acknowledging that there is not and can ever be evidence for its existence. If that's not part of the definition of 'dogmatic', it ought to be.
Another straw man argument. I challenge you to point out the post where I acknowledge that there can never be evidence for God existence. I never said that there can never be evidence for God existence. On the contrary, I explicitly said before that I open to the possibility that there may be someone who can come up with evidence for God existence or evidence for God non-existence.