(August 19, 2013 at 1:58 pm)genkaus Wrote:(August 19, 2013 at 1:31 pm)discipulus Wrote: You have yet to establish your opinions as objective. Simply labeling them so does not mean that I or anyone else must agree.
There is a simple way for you to find out. Try eating poop.
(August 19, 2013 at 1:31 pm)discipulus Wrote: Stepping over the issue of whether or not your views have the weight of objectivity to support them, I simply pose a question:
How are you ultimately any better off than the poop eater?
Because my psychological motivations are sufficiently consistent with my biological ones such that I have no desire to eat poop.
(August 19, 2013 at 1:31 pm)discipulus Wrote: Yes. I am a Christian. I can speak theistically or if I desire to demonstrate a point I can speak atheistically or as one that speaks while taking into account certain implications that follow from a Godless reality.
Unfortunately, you completely fail to understand the implications of a godless reality and therefore you do not actually speak "atheistically".
The poop eater and you will both soon die and your biological functions will cease.
How are you ultimately any better off than such a one?
