(September 1, 2013 at 1:15 pm)Theo Zacharias Wrote: I'm trying to say that our current technology may not be able to detect the small/big effect uniquely attribute to God.
Note that the context of the discussion is about evidence that God, if exists, affect or does not affect the world. You claim that the absence of evidence that God affects the world is evidence of absence, i.e. evidence that God, if exists, does not affect the world. To show that God exists or not, first you have to identify the small/big effect that uniquely attribute to God, then you have to show that our currently technology is able to detect that small/big effect. If the technology detects the change, then it is an evidence that God exists and affect the world. If not, then it's an evidence that God does not exist (or if exists, He does not affect our world). I argue before, that our current technology may not be able to detect that small/big effect. Now, I will add more argument to it that the identity of the effect that uniquely attribute to God is not even clear....
"You sure have got a purty' mouth."