RE: standard of evidence
October 2, 2013 at 10:05 am
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2013 at 10:06 am by LastPoet.)
(October 2, 2013 at 9:49 am)Rational AKD Wrote: extraordinary things and extraordinary claims are not the same and you would do well not to commit an equivocation fallacy. and regardless, calling something an extraordinary thing is still subjective. I would agree that God is an extraordinary thing, but not that it is an extraordinary claim.
and why don't you read the definition of extraordinary and tell me exactly why it is subjective.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/extraordinary
Another dodge. You still miss the point. Don't do hiding in semantics, it is you presenting the evidence, how can we test such evidence value? By mentally masturbating a god that somehow feels like you feel? Thanks, but no thanks.