standard of evidence

[pocaracas]

"Whatever the atheist thinks is his minimum amount of evidence, if we provide it, they'll move the goalpost and make up a higher evidence requirement"... isn't that your corollary?

it's a suspicion of mine.

Why am I not surprised?.... -.-'

For me,

---

I've said it before, and I'll say it again... if an entity which is "a necessary being who created the universe, who is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect." exists, I would only believe it does if it presented itself to me and, simultaneously (or with a bit of delay so he doesn't wake anyone up), to everyone else in the whole world. Spend some time with each and every one of us. Impart on us some of its infinite wisdom. Make all the magic tricks each one of us requires to accept that entity as a real magic man and creator of universes (how hard can it be to create a lump of gold?). And then, show up again with some periodicity, just to keep in touch and not get lost in past memories and provide the younger generations with the same level of experience.

---

even if all that happened, i'm sure you would prefer solipsism over theism.

I'm not one to withdraw what I have said.
When the time comes, we'll see.... until then, I won't hold my breath!

Until the whole world provides accounts of the same experience, all gods are considered as man-made.

textbook Argumentum ad Ignorantiam.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/ignorant.html

Yes, because for a person to make up an extraordinary being is FAR FAR less likely than that being existing in reality...
Grow up!

How did man get to acquire information about this god in which you all believe, while finding no physical interaction with said god?

the information did come from physical interaction with God, at least according to the bible. and no, i'm not begging the question. i'm answering yours which is structured to be an inside inquiry.

I have no idea what is this thing you call an "inside inquiry", but still...
You seem to think the bible is a trustworthy collection of tales about one particular extraordinary entity. Trustworthy in the sense that it portrays real events.
Why is it that you posit so much trust in that particular book, and not in another similar one, like the qu'ran, or the Vedas?
What event(s) in your life has lead you to accept that books tales as depictions of real events?