RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 24, 2013 at 10:37 pm
(This post was last modified: October 24, 2013 at 10:38 pm by Brakeman.)
(October 24, 2013 at 9:53 pm)Polaris Wrote: The religious who push their faith and the atheists who push against faith (without actual provocation) will always need to provide the burden of proof.
No, provocation has nothing to do with it. The theists claim god and his postulates, the atheists deride those claims, meekly or militantly, but make no statutory claims of their own. Only claims need proof. Derision of unsatisfactory proof needs no additional proof. Reason is used to attempt to convince willfully ignorant, but that is a superfluous action.
Find the cure for Fundementia!