Introducing The Universal Religion

[Cyberman]

Knowledge of God is superior to belief in God.

Not necessarily, since (to quote the asheist pope Matt Dillahunty) knowledge is a subset of belief. I could make a Venn diagram of the entire set of things I might believe; of those, only a fraction are things I could claim to know.

We are all entitled to our belief, since no one can prove belief; but not so to our knowledge, unless it is proven to be so.

Is this an unorthodox way of saying "you're entitled to your own beliefs; you are not entitled to your own facts"? Because I can see this coming back to bite you in the arse very soon.

I make bold here and now, that where no Theist or Atheist can prove the existence of God;

It's not up the atheists to prove the existence of "God".

with an unshakeable conviction, I can prove to the world that there is God.

Great - where's your Nobel Prize? In fact, screw that - where's your Templeton Prize? Or your million dollars from the JREF?

The erstwhile design-designer, uncaused-first-cause line of argument stands faulted till tomorrow.

That line of argument is faulted from the ground up.