Pet peeves?

[MJ the Skeptical]

Again, its not that easy. Cigs are more available than weed. Weed does not quell nicotine cravings, and a lot of people top off smoking pot with a cig. So smoking pot now gives me huge cravings for cigs. Sorry reality is not as simple as you wish it to be. If it were, there would be very few smokers.

Also - not everyone can smoke pot. Many people can, but not everyone.

---

Actually I was just pointing out that you do benefit from the taxes on cigs. I actually do not like the cancer industry, thanks.

Cigs are more available, so what. Not a good argument at all.

Weed most certainly can work for quitting cigs, try harder. Once you get over that first week or month without cigs, you're done with them.

And no, you need a reality check, people mostly don't smoke weed over cigs because of the illegal status of it, which if lifted tomorrow would put cigarettes companies out of business unless they changed.

Not everyone can smoke pot, but everyone can smoke cigs? what kind of stupid argument is this, I'm sorry. Or you're saying that some people who can smoke cigs can't smoke pot? what the fuck does this statement even mean...

..Points out the benefits of cigarettes taxes, but is not in favor of the cigarette industry...Do you hear yourself? or did you just want to make that point? I could care less about cig tax money, because it would go over to weed, I just said that. C'mon this is getting asinine. All because I have a pet peeve with smoking cigs. Kind of a butthurt bunch tonight just making an inference based on my opinion.

---

Lawlz. QT, you sound like a know-it-all college student yearning for recognition and attention. This doesn't make you wrong, but it's awfully pathetic.

Since we're analyzing either other now to obfuscate...

You sound like a little teenager using phrases like lawlz

That's more pathetic to obfuscate after defending the cigarette industry.