RE: Heroin overdose cure: It exists, but how do you get it?
February 24, 2014 at 2:34 am
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2014 at 2:38 am by Shell B.)
(February 24, 2014 at 2:14 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: Good thing such choices aren't something that come up in reality. So I dunno why it's even being stated. These aren't decisions that have to be made or will have to be made, so...why are they being mentioned, except than to needlessly point out your stance on what your classification addiction has in regards to priority for treatment?
To point out that there is a middle ground on this. Why is every other classification that is copacetic in this thread have relevance, but mine is brushed off because it doesn't come up in real life? Neither do half the scenarios mentioned here. People rarely go to the hospital for addiction so much as they go for addiction related issues. Do you have an argument against my opinion or do you just want to tell me how irrelevant it is?
(February 24, 2014 at 2:16 am)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: Should we shuffle all people who harm themselves due to controllable factors to the back of the line? Because, I don't ever want to be the person who makes that decision.
Yeah, if there were a shortage of medical care absolutely. How fair is it for someone who is suffering because of the awful hand life has dealt have to suffer and wait so someone else can get help with something that is entirely their fault? What kind of addicted adult would want to get ahead of say a child with leukemia?