(March 6, 2014 at 3:45 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:No, I get that. You tried to score a cheap point by inferring that someone had made an assumption not warranted by the article. That assumption turned out to be exactly correct, so his inference that the Jesus in the article was Jesus Christ, and not Jesus the mailman, very obviously turned out to be correct.(March 6, 2014 at 3:24 pm)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: Indeed. Hence the need for 30 seconds of additional research which revealed that this guy is indeed invoking jesus as the inspiration for his snake oil, which he is selling for a handsome profit, presumably to people who believe his claims of divine revelation. So it it appear that the filthy heathen scum got it right and you got it wrong.
Beware of false profits (sic)
You still don't get it, I specifically asked about the story that HE LINKED because I know he would never admit to being wrong. The honest answer is that the word "Christ" doesn't appear anywhere in his article, but instead of admitting it, he avoids the question altogether.
This is really irksome to me. Somebody, in the most cynical way possible, used the name of the christ you and I believe in to make a fast buck. As Christians we should be FIRST in the queue to deplore such behavior, its the name of OUR God and OUR religion that he's dragging through the gutter. The atheists, they don't have a dog in this fight! We DO.
And yet you give him the benefit of the doubt and criticize THEM for thinking the worst of someone who is clearly as guilty as a puppy next to a pile of poo.
This is one reasons I find it really hard to call myself a Christian some days
"Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken."
Sith code
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken."
Sith code
