RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
March 16, 2014 at 10:44 am
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2014 at 10:45 am by Heywood.)
(March 16, 2014 at 10:32 am)Faith No More Wrote:(March 16, 2014 at 10:26 am)Heywood Wrote: The banks guide the river to a particular destination.
And do you think that it requires a sentient being to keep those rivers flowing?
Evolution is different from a river. You can replicate a river by the simple act of dumping a whole lot of water on the ground and the river will form its own banks.
If you try to replicate evolution you need to construct those banks before hand.
(March 16, 2014 at 10:33 am)Esquilax Wrote:(March 16, 2014 at 10:26 am)Heywood Wrote: The banks guide the river to a particular destination. Do you think that when Dawkins said evolution was blind, he meant that it had no eyes?
No, I think he meant that there was no conscious force guiding it.
re-watch the video and then tell us if you still think that.