Richard Dawkin's big blunder

[Esquilax]

I'm sorry Esquilax since you have stooped to name calling, I no longer feel obligated to respond to any of your posts. I'm not saying I am ignoring you....it's just that I don't see much point in carrying on a conversation with you if your inclination is to verbally abuse your adversary.

I will of course respect your position as a moderator and will fill obligated to respond when you post something in accordance with your position.

Transparent dodge: the vast majority of my post was a perfectly fine rebuttal of your argument, and your decision to harp on a single- fairly tame, let's be honest- insult speaks more to your inability to deal with the facts of my argument than anything else.

And frankly, I find it far more rude and frustrating that you opted to simply repeat your initial assertion as though I hadn't said anything the first time around.