Richard Dawkin's big blunder

[Heywood]

Perhaps I'm reading too much into your convoluted view of natural selection but you seem to project human consciousness onto all of matter, from the collision of every atom to each organism. That is, because humans can guide evolution through artificial selection or design incredibly complex silicon machinery that mimics biological functionality, this implies that consciousness somehow must have manipulated the entire Universe for last the 13.8 billion years.

Humans or any sufficient intellect, can guide evolution to produce specific forms by designing the fitness paradigm and letting natural selection do its thing.

Here is a video of an intellect using a genetic algorithm to evolve a face. The human intellect isn't actively choosing what random image gets bred from and what image doesn't as in the case of artificial selection.

---

Evolution is our explanation for the production of complexity, diversity, and knowledge that happened on this planet the last few billion years.
If it makes you feel better you can substitute "ultimately results" with "sometimes results"....and then the definition isn't lacking anymore.

Still lacking.. how does it work for the "other times"?

I don't understand your question.