Argument #2: Evolution Of Species

[Simon Moon]

Argument #2: Evolution of Species

The evolutionist Kerkut defined the “general theory of evolution” as “the theory that living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.” He goes on to say, “The evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.” G. A. Kerkut, Implications of Evolution (Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1960), p.157.

Kerkut made this statement in 1960.

That was 55 years ago. Evidence has passed him by, by decades.

My argument is not that change doesn’t take place within species over time. My argument is that no matter how long the time frame, there is no substantial scientific evidence that a microbe has evolved into a human being. Additionally, there is no substantial scientific evidence that non-living chemicals can produce a living cell regardless of time and/or chance.

But you're not making an argument. You're making unsupported assertions.

The people with actual credentials can explain, with evidence and not breaking any scientific laws, how this can happen.

So, again all you prove is that you got nothing.