(May 11, 2014 at 12:59 am)ChadWooters Wrote: You see, MFM, if someone knows what they are talking about they don't cut and paste and present the results as their argument. You're dealing with clowns.
I notice my challenge to one such bozo to name one thing a person can know apart from reason applied to experience went unanswered.
This from the idiot supporting an argument as conclusive when the argument was presented as inconclusive without presumption.
Which leads me to believe you and MFM are cribbing from sources without having read the original argument, otherwise you'd know this, and simply failing to provide the sources, and pass it off as your own original thought.
If you want to discuss an argument which hasn't been historically knocked down and curb-stomped by multiple sources, present something new and original instead of copy-pasting arguments that you haven't bothered to investigate yourself.
