Component parts of anything which exist have to find order from disorder. A cell, or anything else for that matter needs to be a collection of organized pieces which inter-relate before their combined result can be called life. Which single piece of a cell came first. It's sort of like, which came first, the chicken or the egg. Neither one came first, since without one the other would have never existed.
The idea that given enough time these actions would occur in one place to create life is in itself a huge fallacy. It doesn't matter how much time is needed to create randomness, it is still random.
Life is a team effort, with all of the parts working together in agreement to support the life of the organism.
It's easy to look at the variety of life on earth and just deduce that it all had to begin somehow and then change into whatever it can through time. Watching life alter itself does not show how it began, only that it changes after it has been created.
The simplest of mechanisms have to be understood from the beginning. Watching the process after it has begun does not explain how it started.
Cellular life can not be upwardly mobile. Let's say that a simple cell has all of the components in it to provide for it's simple life. It does not need anything else in it to change anything, it reproduces over and over with near the same results. Does that cell need a heart, a liver, eyes, ears, anything extra at all. No. That cell would not know how to integrate any of those extra parts anyway. I f this cell is going to change, it has to have a preprogrammed set of instructions so that the variation can be used by the creature. That cell did not have any provision for extra parts-it could not even find a place to connect them in or integrate these extra parts at all.
Let's say we have a simple life form with only four parts. Which part was invented first, and how did it manage to sustain itself without the other three. None of the four parts individually can have any life it. It is only when the four parts are brought together at the same time can life proceed. The most important aspect of this union is the timing of the events. Now this event could possibly occur at random if the right parts were joined together at the right time to make life. Unfortunately, life is not made of four parts, especially if the four are random atoms. There are a required number of interactions between the multitude of parts before life can take hold.
You might conclude that the starting of life has nothing to do with the ongoing changes we see in living creatures. If evolution is true, it has to apply at the beginning of life, if it started that way. Instead of looking at fully developed creatures and backdating the process, see the absurdity of single cells becoming upwardly mobile.
The idea that given enough time these actions would occur in one place to create life is in itself a huge fallacy. It doesn't matter how much time is needed to create randomness, it is still random.
Life is a team effort, with all of the parts working together in agreement to support the life of the organism.
It's easy to look at the variety of life on earth and just deduce that it all had to begin somehow and then change into whatever it can through time. Watching life alter itself does not show how it began, only that it changes after it has been created.
The simplest of mechanisms have to be understood from the beginning. Watching the process after it has begun does not explain how it started.
Cellular life can not be upwardly mobile. Let's say that a simple cell has all of the components in it to provide for it's simple life. It does not need anything else in it to change anything, it reproduces over and over with near the same results. Does that cell need a heart, a liver, eyes, ears, anything extra at all. No. That cell would not know how to integrate any of those extra parts anyway. I f this cell is going to change, it has to have a preprogrammed set of instructions so that the variation can be used by the creature. That cell did not have any provision for extra parts-it could not even find a place to connect them in or integrate these extra parts at all.
Let's say we have a simple life form with only four parts. Which part was invented first, and how did it manage to sustain itself without the other three. None of the four parts individually can have any life it. It is only when the four parts are brought together at the same time can life proceed. The most important aspect of this union is the timing of the events. Now this event could possibly occur at random if the right parts were joined together at the right time to make life. Unfortunately, life is not made of four parts, especially if the four are random atoms. There are a required number of interactions between the multitude of parts before life can take hold.
You might conclude that the starting of life has nothing to do with the ongoing changes we see in living creatures. If evolution is true, it has to apply at the beginning of life, if it started that way. Instead of looking at fully developed creatures and backdating the process, see the absurdity of single cells becoming upwardly mobile.
