RE: Pro-life atheists
May 27, 2014 at 1:04 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 1:06 am by Losty.)
(May 27, 2014 at 12:52 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:51 am)Losty Wrote: It's getting a little pathetic Heywood. Be a grown up, admit that you're being dishonest about the definition of viability, and go back to one of your other ridiculous arguments. I for one quite enjoyed the whole abortion is never necesarry to save a woman's life because I don't believe that argument.
You still haven't provided one case where a late term abortion was the only option. That lady you says knows of cases but can't tell us because of patient privacy is BS argument. She doesn't need to tell us who the patient is/was.....all she needs to do is say this specific condition cannot be treated except via a late term abortion.
Really? I don't fucking know her. I quoted a statement she made to a news reporter. I never said she couldn't give an example because of privacy. I made a facetious remark about hopping over to wherever she is and requesting the specific cases.
Pre e is a real reason why women need late term abortions. Do you even know what pre e is? Or what can happen if you don't get immediate treatment? You cannot always induce labor when a woman's life is on the line. Guess what happens during labor? Your blood pressure goes up! Guess what happens when you have pre e and your blood pressure keeps going up? You die!
Do you think inducing labor means pressing a button and a baby magically pops out? No. It is unpredictable and can take hours or even days.
Ps. I did in fact notice that you changed the subject from viability after being called out.