(May 28, 2014 at 5:13 pm)Heywood Wrote:(May 28, 2014 at 5:06 pm)Beccs Wrote: Really bad comparison. The boy hit by a car continuing to live is not an immediate threat to the life of someone else.
Its not a comparison, It is an example to show that there is a difference between being killed and dying. It is my position that it is almost always wrong to kill human beings. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
And it's my position that:
1. Your definition of what constitutes a human being is based on your own opinion and not accepted medical fact.
2. A living, breathing person should always be given priority over a fetus - a POTENTIAL human - especially before the age of viability
3. That after viability, removing a fetus that is a danger to its mother and letting "nature take its course" - especially when that course is a slow, agonising death - is itself barbaric.
Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Dying to live, living to die.