RE: The existence of "Ghosts" means...
August 14, 2014 at 9:52 pm
(August 14, 2014 at 9:31 pm)CristW Wrote: Your title fits you.
I thought ignoramus was being polite, given all the unsubstantiated shit you've been claiming.
(August 14, 2014 at 9:31 pm)CristW Wrote: If you had any scientific background and took philosophy you could simply observe my posts as postulates to an hypothesis.
Au contraire, you don't need to have done any science or philosophy courses to realize you're excreting bovine faecal matter from your oral cavity. Translation; you're talking bullshit.
(August 14, 2014 at 9:31 pm)CristW Wrote: Simply, leprechauns could not be proven because there is no ounce of data to confirm their existence.
Just as there's none for UFOs and Ghosts.
(August 14, 2014 at 9:31 pm)CristW Wrote: If there were we could have some data by some person with a camera phone showing ...a golden pot with money and rainbows in some wood area in Ireland!!!
That would just show someone had put a pot of coins on the ground when it had just rained and the white light of the sun was diffracted into its constituent wavelengths, nothing more.
(August 14, 2014 at 9:31 pm)CristW Wrote: As for UFOs/ETs and "ghosts", for some odd reason we have plenty of those available!!!
No we don't.