RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
September 28, 2014 at 12:45 am
(This post was last modified: September 28, 2014 at 12:52 am by Huggy Bear.)
(September 28, 2014 at 12:06 am)Esquilax Wrote:(September 27, 2014 at 11:15 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: My point in using bees as an example is to show that the Fibonacci Sequence is not just found in "structure" but also in animal behavior.
Yeah, and I'm still confused as to why you stopped at this specific level of granularity, given that you can find plenty of other repeated patterns in the natural world too: lots of things in nature are green, and somehow- most likely through space magic- sometimes even the animals in those environments are green too! How did that happen?
Why stick to this Fibonacci Sequence stuff? Could it be that, though there are far more widespread patterns, none of them sound nearly as portentous and significant as the one that you can attach a special kind of man-made designation to, that makes it sound designed?
Seriously, think about it: if patterns are signs of design, don't you have better things to point to? Or are you just worried about how silly you'd look pointing to a bunch of similar colors and simplistic shapes and saying those are indicators of divine authorship?
It appears that you can't grasp the concept of the word "sequence". A sequence is never random...hence the word.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sequence
Quote:se·quence
noun \ˈsē-kwən(t)s, -ˌkwen(t)s\
: the order in which things happen or should happen
: a group of things that come one after the other
so if nature behaves according to a sequence, then by definition it cannot be random.
randomly banging on the keys of a piano = noise, but in sequence = music
Oh, and speaking of music