(October 31, 2014 at 11:36 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(October 31, 2014 at 11:33 am)rasetsu Wrote: I don't think you understand Bell's theorem. The theorem predicts that.
I completely don't understand Bell's theorem, not even close. Apologies if I made a wrong conclusion, I guess I was just more trying to push the fact that Bell's Theorem (according to wikipedia of course) still isn't some absolute truth.
Bell's theorem is what we got at the moment. Your counter argument is "Heywood you are wrong because Bell's theorem isn't some absolute truth...it could be wrong...it just hasn't been shown wrong yet"
Isn't that an atheism of the gaps argument?