RE: Atheism is unreasonable
November 6, 2014 at 7:00 am
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2014 at 7:17 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(November 5, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 4, 2014 at 4:01 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: It speaks volumes that you believe yourself to be superior after some Google searching and some heavy indoctrination in matters of theorietcal physicists than those who spent their entire lives dedicated to learning and research.
Well I will put it to you this way, Mr. Moderator...unless you have a degree in physics, I expect google to be your friend also.
I'm not a physicist - But I am an academic researcher to PhD level. So yeah, google is my friend. But you won't see me acting silly saying that a 5 minute google search has given me all the information I need to debunk something that minds far superior and far more dedicated than me have devloped over (often) generations.
Again, arrogance, blind arrogance at that, gets you nothing.
(November 5, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 4, 2014 at 4:01 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: It's fairly simple to figure out that you're not in academia or indeed have studied to any high level.
I get my info from those that DO study. And btw, it is simple to figure out that most of these people who are responding to me...it is apparent that they aren't in academia or studied to any high level either.
Maybe, maybe not. But hey, let's recognise the fact that it's you who are dismissing the evidence that is given to you as a rebuttal or indeed the evidence of theories that you are rejecting and giving nothing back but unsupported assertions and claims. You're talking about subjects you don't understand as though you were an expert, and it's painfully obvious that you don't in fact really get anything aside what your apologist websites are quoting to you (and even then it's hit and miss, it seems).
Dismissal of evidenced claims/theories (etc) requires evidence that falsifies that claim. I can see the odd quotation from WLC and the odd use of Kalam here and there. And that's it. Great job. We're all convinced.
(November 5, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 4, 2014 at 4:01 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: 'Brevity is the soul of wit'. It's not our fault that we can't figure out what the hell most of your posts are saying.
Yet, dang near every sentence that I make is being quoted and responded to.
Don't be stupid.
(November 5, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 4, 2014 at 4:01 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Please don't act so puerile.
It is called "the actual factuals".
Don't be stupid.
(November 5, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 4, 2014 at 4:01 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: The bible is only a claim. You can Try and equivocate it to records of governments held in antiquity or to fictional novels like the odyssey, but none of those things are claiming supernatural, life controlling constraints on the lives of every human and neither are they claiming to know how life started or how it will end.
The bible is only a claim? Well, so was the statement "The Bible is only a claim."
Are you ill? Your only rebuttal to the factual statement that the bible is a claim is 'nuh uh'? Wow. Ok...
(November 5, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 4, 2014 at 4:01 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: And that's without going into any detail about the blatant falsities contained in the bible, of which there are many.
Like?
Too many to name. How about the Exodus that never happened (no evidence), or the Mt Sinai that was never visited (no evidence). Or the characters in the bible that never lived to be over 800 years old (no evidence) and so on and so on.
All claims. No evidence.
(November 5, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 4, 2014 at 4:01 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Nah. They give reasons, not necessarily good ones.
Speak for yourself
Exactly my point. I don't expect you to understand or realise just how badly your arguments have been deconstructed and dismantled on this thread, but I suspect a lot of the members and indeed lurkers have had a good time reading through this train wreck.
So please carry on. You're doing a sterling job of reinforcing the perception that many theists don't know their arse from their elbow.
The old canard of 'I don't have enough faith to be an atheist' is so utterly stupid that I can't think of why a reasonable person would ever utilise it in a serious manner. So I can only conclude that you're not reasonable, and this is evidenced through this thread.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.