(November 13, 2014 at 8:58 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Wow... learn to read, you must...
You posited the theory to work for both interpretations...the finite interpretation, and the eternal interpretation.
So A is A and A is B at the same time.
(November 13, 2014 at 8:58 pm)pocaracas Wrote: To you, adequate means "something that agrees with your interpretation". Sorry, your analogies are flawed, and you know it, but you like to see people stumped by them. All theists like that about their analogies.
It's curious how most things in theology are conveyed by analogy... it's like the "real" thing is not available for comment.
Red Herring in full effect.